Sometimes I read the Toronto Sun. Â Not because I like the paper, but because I really hate it. Â I think its important to know what the “other side” is saying, and to understand that there are people who actually believe what that newspaper prints. Â Case in point: this article from the online version of the paper, which references an article in yesterday’s print edition. Â The article outlines a complaint from the Canadian Taxpayers Federation complaining about going to the Summerworks Festival, specifically due to funds going to a play called “Homegrown”.
Homegrown is a play about one of the members of the Toronto 18, calling the play sympathetic to terrorists. Â The article uses this play as a springboard for the Sun’s familiar complaint about funding for the arts, and how the funding plays is destroying the fabric of our society – ok, this article doesn’t say specifically that, but its clear that the Sun is revving up their readers to be outraged about this “abuse of public funds”. Â Some choice quotes from the article:
The [Summerworks] festival receives more than $90,000 from all three levels of government including $35,000 from Heritage Canada. Homegrown received $6,000 from the city funded Toronto Arts Council for a workshop. Â The playâ€™s writer, Catherine Frid, stressed Friday that the play isnâ€™t condoning terrorism but is a â€œsympathetic portraitâ€ of one of the men caught up in the terror bust.
But Kevin Gaudet, of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, said tax dollars shouldnâ€™t be going towards a â€œterrorist love-inâ€.Â â€œYou want to put on a play? Fine. Hang up your shingle and ask people to pay for it … and if it has to do with sympathetic portraits of terrorists who want to destroy my country, I wonâ€™t go,â€ Gaudet said.
It is of course, important to note that the CTF:
objects to funding for all festivals from Pride Toronto to the Calgary Stampede, he said.â€œWe advocate against all this type of funding in that context,â€ Gaudet said.
CTF is a conservative group that objects to most public funding of events. Of course, without the kind of funding they object to, there would be no Fringe Festival, no jazz festival, no TIFF, no Stratford or Shaw festivals, or really any cultural events whatsoever. Â The play that CTF is “objecting to” is an excuse for the old saw about the bugaboo of the evils of public funding for the arts.
Arts fundingÂ organizationsÂ from all levels of government need to fund shows based on their merit or their relevance, rather than on their political ramifications. Â This means that sometimes there will be controversial plays that are funded by the government. Â But this is not a bad thing. Â The arts should challenge political correctness, they should be controversial, they should spark debate. Â If nothing controversial can ever receive funding because the sensitive right-wingers at the CTF (which will always be offended because public funds are involved) or the Sun might be offended, then all funded art will be safe and boring.
The article itself may be familiar territory for the Sun, the most important part of the article are the online comments. Â Many of the comments are from people who are just as outraged as the Sun (and the CTF) wanted them to be. Â These are the people who believe that the arts are not worth funding. Â These are the people who think that artists are swimming in money, people who think like Stephen Harper does when he talked about funding cuts back in the last Federal election (“I think when ordinary working people come home, turn on the TV and see a gala of a bunch of people at, you know, a rich gala all subsidized by taxpayers claiming their subsidies aren’t high enough, when they know those subsidies have actually gone up â€“ I’m not sure that’s something that resonates with ordinary people,”*). Â In my mind, the comments say the most. Â These are the people and attitudes that artists are up “against” when election time comes, when people want to be outraged about “wasted government spending”, and how the arts are for the rich and not for “regular people” so why should we fund them? Â I’d consider the comments a “must read”, at the very least, to know what those people who disagree with arts funding believe, so that those of us who recognize the importance of funding can plan our response.
*Quoted from the Toronto Star, Sept. 24, 2008